In re Caney

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Caney

808 A.2d 852, 174 N.J. 406

DecidedNovember 4, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 808 A.2d 852 (In re Caney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Caney, 808 A.2d 852, 174 N.J. 406 (N.J. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a petition with the Supreme Court pursuant to Rule l:20-ll(a) recommending that JOEL D. CANEY of CHERRY HILL who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, be immediately temporarily suspended from the .practice of law, respondent having consented to disbarment in Pennsylvania for the misuse of client funds, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOEL D. CANEY is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by JOEL D. CANEY pursuant to Rule 1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

[407]*407ORDERED that JOEL D. CANEY be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a petition with the Supreme Court pursuant to Rule l:20-ll(a) recommending that JOEL D. CANEY of CHERRY HILL who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, be immediately temporarily suspended from the .practice of law, respondent having consented to disbarment in Pennsylvania for the misuse of client funds, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOEL D. CANEY is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by JOEL D. CANEY pursuant to Rule 1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

[407]*407ORDERED that JOEL D. CANEY be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

808 A.2d 852, 174 N.J. 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-caney-nj-2002.