in Re: Camilia Jones

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: January 27, 2022
• Docket: 05-21-01111-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

Denied and Opinion Issued January 27, 2022

In the Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-01111-CV

IN RE CAMILIA JONES, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 254th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-21-07710

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Carlyle Before the Court are relator’s January 10, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus

and motion for emergency stay and real party’s January 14, 2022 response and

motion to expedite.

Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court

clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In

re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

Based on our review of the petition, record, and response, we conclude relator has

failed to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny the

petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We deny relator’s motion

for emergency stay and real party’s motion to expedite as moot. /Cory L. Carlyle// 21111f.p05 CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE

–2–