in Re Cameron Jay Scheel
This text of in Re Cameron Jay Scheel (in Re Cameron Jay Scheel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Catherine Stone, Justice
Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 25, 2002
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus. The trial court's order states that "a record of testimony was made;" however, the relator did not file "a properly authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony from any underlying proceeding, including any exhibits offered in evidence." Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(2). In addition, the original petition for divorce states that the "[i]nformation required by section 152.209 of the Texas Family Code is provided in the attached affidavit;" however, the original petition for divorce included in the exhibits to the mandamus petition did not include the attached affidavit. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice to refiling a petition in compliance with rule 52 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Relator shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Cameron Jay Scheel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-cameron-jay-scheel-texapp-2002.