in Re: Calvin Wayne Copeland
This text of in Re: Calvin Wayne Copeland (in Re: Calvin Wayne Copeland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-06-536-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE CALVIN WAYNE COPELAND
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Castillo
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Relator, Calvin Wayne Copeland, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause seeking to overturn a determination of competency to stand trial. Relator has failed to present a record to the Court. Tex. R. App. P. 52.7. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum opinion delivered and filed
this 23rd day of October, 2006.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Calvin Wayne Copeland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-calvin-wayne-copeland-texapp-2006.