In re Calvin
This text of 255 A.D. 721 (In re Calvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse upon the following ground: Section 11 of the Election Law provides that when any party rule “ provides for the equal representation of sexes from each unit, the designating petitions and primary ballots shall carry such party positions separately by sexes.” The Democratic party has adopted a rule for equal representation of sexes in each unit. The rule was not complied with in this case. A violation makes the petition invalid.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
255 A.D. 721, 6 N.Y.S.2d 749, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-calvin-nyappdiv-1938.