in Re: Calvin McNac

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 7, 2013·No. 05-13-00603-CV·Published

Opinion

DENY; and Opinion Filed May 7, 2013.

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00603-CV

IN RE CALVIN MCNAC, Relator

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F03-71678-T

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Francis, and Fillmore Opinion by Justice Fillmore The Court has before it relator’s petition for writ of mandamus in which he asks this

Court to order the trial court to rule on his motion for post-conviction DNA testing. The facts

and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the

record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See

Simon v. Levario, 306 S.W.3d 318, 320–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (orig. proceeding); State of

Tex. ex. rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927–28 (Tex. Crim. App.

2001) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE

130603F.P05

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Calvin McNac, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re: Calvin McNac (in Re: Calvin McNac) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simon v. Levario
306 S.W.3d 318 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2009)
Hill v. Court of Appeals for Fifth Dist.
34 S.W.3d 924 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2001)