in Re Calvin Hyder
This text of in Re Calvin Hyder (in Re Calvin Hyder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-11-00156-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE CALVIN HYDER
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Garza, Vela and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1
Relator, Calvin Hyder, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus alleging that the
Honorable Michael Welborn, presiding judge of the 156th Judicial District Court of Bee
County, Texas, abused his discretion by declining to vacate relator’s conviction of
harrassment. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 42.07 (Vernon 2003).
Having reviewed and fully considered relator’s petition, this Court is of the opinion
that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief requested and that the petition
1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions), 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”). should be denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of
mandamus is DENIED.2
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 23rd day of March, 2011.
2 Hyder has also filed with this Court a “Motion for Production and Inspection of Documents,” apparently asking that we compel the production of certain documents produced as part of the trial court proceedings, including the indictment. The motion is denied. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Calvin Hyder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-calvin-hyder-texapp-2011.