In re Calonge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Calonge

88 A.D.3d 1060, 930 N.Y.2d 917

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 13, 2011

StatusPublished

This text of 88 A.D.3d 1060 (In re Calonge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Calonge, 88 A.D.3d 1060, 930 N.Y.2d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By order dated June 19, 2008, this Court suspended respondent for a period of two years (Matter of Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111 [2008]). She now applies for reinstatement. Petitioner advises it does not oppose the application.

Our examination of the papers submitted on the application indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with this Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 806.9). We are also satisfied that respondent has complied with the requirements of this Court’s rules regarding reinstatement (see 22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]) and that she possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law.

Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Mercure, J.E, Spain, Malone Jr., McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI