in Re Calla Davis, Melvin Hurst III, and Ann B. Hearn
This text of in Re Calla Davis, Melvin Hurst III, and Ann B. Hearn (in Re Calla Davis, Melvin Hurst III, and Ann B. Hearn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
August 29, 2008
Mr. Craig T. Enoch Winstead PC 401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2100 Austin, TX 78701
Mr. William Richard Thompson III Hankinson Levinger LLP 2305 Cedar Springs, Suite 230 Dallas, TX 75201 Mr. Grant Hugh Brenna Assistant District Attorney Administration Building, 5th Floor 411 Elm Street, Suite 500 Dallas, TX 75202-3384
RE: Case Number: 07-0147 Court of Appeals Number: 05-07-00198-CV Trial Court Number:
Style: IN RE CALLA DAVIS, MELVIN HURST III, AND ANN B. HEARN
Dear Counsel:
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(a), the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus and issued the enclosed opinion in the above-referenced cause. The Motion to Strike Response to Mandamus is denied as amended.
Sincerely, [pic]
Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk
by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk Enclosures |cc:|Ms. Lisa Matz | | |Mr. Aaron Paul Graft | | |Mr. James Michael | | |Coffman | | |Mr. Craig B. Florence |
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Calla Davis, Melvin Hurst III, and Ann B. Hearn, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-calla-davis-melvin-hurst-iii-and-ann-b-hearn-tex-2008.