In re Calim
694 N.E.2d 896, 82 Ohio St. 3d 96, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1517
Opinions
We adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Applicant’s current application for admission to the bar is disapproved. Applicant is permitted to reapply for admission to the practice of law in Ohio by submitting a new application that contains complete, up-to-date information on all matters raised by the local admissions committee as well as any new matter that may have arisen after the hearing.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Calim, 694 N.E.2d 896, 82 Ohio St. 3d 96, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1517 (Ohio 1998).
694 N.E.2d 896 (In re Calim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Panepinto
704 N.E.2d 564 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
In re Application of Calim
1998 Ohio 260 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)