In re Calim

694 N.E.2d 896, 82 Ohio St. 3d 96, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1517
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 10, 1998·No. No. 98-51·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Applicant’s current application for admission to the bar is disapproved. Applicant is permitted to reapply for admission to the practice of law in Ohio by submitting a new application that contains complete, up-to-date information on all matters raised by the local admissions committee as well as any new matter that may have arisen after the hearing.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Calim, 694 N.E.2d 896, 82 Ohio St. 3d 96, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1517 (Ohio 1998).

694 N.E.2d 896 (In re Calim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Panepinto
704 N.E.2d 564 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
In re Application of Calim
1998 Ohio 260 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)