Home/Ohio Supreme Court/In re Calim

In re Calim

694 N.E.2d 896, 82 Ohio St. 3d 96, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1517
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 10, 1998
DocketNo. 98-51
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 694 N.E.2d 896 (In re Calim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Calim, 694 N.E.2d 896, 82 Ohio St. 3d 96, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1517 (Ohio 1998).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Applicant’s current application for admission to the bar is disapproved. Applicant is permitted to reapply for admission to the practice of law in Ohio by submitting a new application that contains complete, up-to-date information on all matters raised by the local admissions committee as well as any new matter that may have arisen after the hearing.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Panepinto
704 N.E.2d 564 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
In re Application of Calim
1998 Ohio 260 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
694 N.E.2d 896, 82 Ohio St. 3d 96, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-calim-ohio-1998.