In re Califorrniaa
546 U.S. 809, 126 S. Ct. 127, 73 U.S.L.W. 3720
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 3, 2005·No. No. 04-1548; No. 04-1597; No. 04-1623; No. 04-1638; No. 04-1717; No. 04-9895; No. 04-10085; No. 04-10203; No. 04-10429; No. 04-10517; No. 04-10521; No. 04-10533; No. 04-10663; No. 04-10670; No. 05-119; No. 05-154; No. 05-5033; No. 05-5110; No. 05-5134; No. 05-5194; No. 05-5215; No. 05-5261; No. 05-5407; No. 05-5551; No. 05-5585; No. 05-5673; No. 05-5993·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Petitions for writs of mandamus denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Califorrniaa, 546 U.S. 809, 126 S. Ct. 127, 73 U.S.L.W. 3720 (2005).
546 U.S. 809 (In re Califorrniaa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Von Kahl v. Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
810 F. Supp. 2d 138 (District of Columbia, 2011)
McCartney v. Ryland
52 So. 3d 998 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2010)
Robert Kevin McCartney v. Carolyn J. Ryland
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2010
DCFS v. Garcia
911 So. 2d 171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)