In re Califorrniaa
546 U.S. 809, 126 S. Ct. 127, 73 U.S.L.W. 3720
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 3, 2005
DocketNo. 04-1548; No. 04-1597; No. 04-1623; No. 04-1638; No. 04-1717; No. 04-9895; No. 04-10085; No. 04-10203; No. 04-10429; No. 04-10517; No. 04-10521; No. 04-10533; No. 04-10663; No. 04-10670; No. 05-119; No. 05-154; No. 05-5033; No. 05-5110; No. 05-5134; No. 05-5194; No. 05-5215; No. 05-5261; No. 05-5407; No. 05-5551; No. 05-5585; No. 05-5673; No. 05-5993
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 546 U.S. 809 (In re Califorrniaa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Califorrniaa, 546 U.S. 809, 126 S. Ct. 127, 73 U.S.L.W. 3720 (2005).
Opinion
Petitions for writs of mandamus denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Von Kahl v. Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.
810 F. Supp. 2d 138 (District of Columbia, 2011)
McCartney v. Ryland
52 So. 3d 998 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2010)
Robert Kevin McCartney v. Carolyn J. Ryland
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2010
DCFS v. Garcia
911 So. 2d 171 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
546 U.S. 809, 126 S. Ct. 127, 73 U.S.L.W. 3720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-califorrniaa-scotus-2005.