In re Calder
This text of 821 S.E.2d 918 (In re Calder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondent has submitted a Motion to Resign in Lieu of Discipline pursuant to Rule 35 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules. In light of Respondent's serious misconduct which demonstrates an unfitness to practice law, we grant the Motion to Resign in Lieu of Discipline. In accordance with the provisions of Rule 35, RLDE, Respondent "acknowledges that disciplinary counsel can prove" the allegations of misconduct. Moreover, Rule 35 provides Respondent's resignation shall be permanent , and he will never be eligible to apply, and will not be considered, for admission or reinstatement to the practice *919of law or for any limited practice of law in South Carolina.
Within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order, Respondent shall file an affidavit with the Clerk of Court showing that he has complied with Rule 30, RLDE, and shall also surrender his Certificate of Admission to Practice Law to the Clerk of Court.
/s/ Donald W. Beatty C.J.
/s/ John W. Kittredge J.
/s/ Kaye G. Hearn J.
/s/ John Cannon Few J.
/s/ George C. James, Jr. J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
821 S.E.2d 918, 425 S.C. 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-calder-sc-2018.