In re Caldarone

313 A.2d 666, 112 R.I. 937, 1974 R.I. LEXIS 1526
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided January 9, 1974·No. M. P. Nos. 73-266, 272·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Two petitions for writs of habeas corpus, each

of which seeks a review of petitioner’s conviction by a Superior Court jury on charges concerning the illegal possession of barbiturates, drugs and hypodermic ‘ needles and syringes are consolidated. It appearing that petitioners’ rights to appeal having been lost because of some incident for which they were not responsible, the instant petitions will be articulated as petitions for writs of certiorari. Hester v. Timothy, 108 R. I. 376, 275 A.2d 637 (1971); MacKenzie & Shea v. R. I. Hospital Trust Co., 45 R. I. 407, 122 A. 774 (1923). Petitions are granted without prejudice to the state’s-right to raise at oral • argument the question of the improvidence of the issuance of the writs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Caldarone, 313 A.2d 666, 112 R.I. 937, 1974 R.I. LEXIS 1526 (R.I. 1974).

313 A.2d 666 (In re Caldarone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Caldarone
313 A.2d 666 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1974)