In re Caldarone
Opinion
Two petitions for writs of habeas corpus, each
of which seeks a review of petitioner’s conviction by a Superior Court jury on charges concerning the illegal possession of barbiturates, drugs and hypodermic ‘ needles and syringes are consolidated. It appearing that petitioners’ rights to appeal having been lost because of some incident for which they were not responsible, the instant petitions will be articulated as petitions for writs of certiorari. Hester v. Timothy, 108 R. I. 376, 275 A.2d 637 (1971); MacKenzie & Shea v. R. I. Hospital Trust Co., 45 R. I. 407, 122 A. 774 (1923). Petitions are granted without prejudice to the state’s-right to raise at oral • argument the question of the improvidence of the issuance of the writs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
313 A.2d 666 (In re Caldarone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.