In re Calabrese

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Calabrese

36 A.3d 838, 2012 WL 310507

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided February 2, 2012·No. No. 11-BG-1276·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of Bar Counsel’s report regarding petitioner’s petition for reinstatement, the petition for reinstatement, and it appearing that petitioner filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit on November 5, 2004 and therefore is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, it is

ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for reinstatement is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Michael R. Calabrese, Esquire is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of Bar Counsel’s report regarding petitioner’s petition for reinstatement, the petition for reinstatement, and it appearing that petitioner filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit on November 5, 2004 and therefore is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, it is

ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for reinstatement is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Michael R. Calabrese, Esquire is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia.

In re Calabrese, 36 A.3d 838, 2012 WL 310507 (D.C. 2012).

Pincite

36 A.3d 838 (In re Calabrese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.