In re Caiola

207 A.3d 263, 238 N.J. 26
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 14, 2019·No. D-59 September Term 2018; 082213·Published

Opinion

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 18-217, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(default by respondent) that Alexander Thomas Caiola of Elizabeth, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1996, *264should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(a) (commingling and failure to safeguard client funds), RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations) and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that Alexander Thomas Caiola is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Caiola, 207 A.3d 263, 238 N.J. 26 (N.J. 2019).

207 A.3d 263 (In re Caiola) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.