In re Caggiano

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Caggiano

758 A.2d 154, 165 N.J. 475, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1213

DecidedSeptember 12, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 758 A.2d 154 (In re Caggiano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Caggiano, 758 A.2d 154, 165 N.J. 475, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1213 (N.J. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that LOUIS N. CAGGIANO, JR., of MT. LAUREL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.1(b) (pattern of neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to keep client reasonably informed about the status of matter and to comply promptly with reasonable requests for [476]*476information), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to explain matter to extent reasonably necessary to permit client to make informed decision regarding the representation), and RPC 8.4(c) (misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that LOUIS N. CAGGIANO, JR., is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that LOUIS N. CAGGIANO, JR., of MT. LAUREL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.1(b) (pattern of neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to keep client reasonably informed about the status of matter and to comply promptly with reasonable requests for [476]*476information), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to explain matter to extent reasonably necessary to permit client to make informed decision regarding the representation), and RPC 8.4(c) (misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that LOUIS N. CAGGIANO, JR., is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

758 A.2d 154, 165 N.J. 475, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-caggiano-nj-2000.