In Re: C L Abor v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re: C L Abor v. the State of Texas (In Re: C L Abor v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismiss in part and Deny in part and Opinion Filed August 12, 2024
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00930-CV No. 05-24-00931-CV No. 05-24-00936-CV No. 05-24-00937-CV
IN RE C L ABOR, Relator
Original Proceedings from Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 24-6306-M2, 24-6305-M2, 24-6305-M2BF-A, and 24-6306-M2BF-A
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Pedersen, III, Smith, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III Before the Court is pro se relator’s August 8, 2024 petition for writ of
mandamus. Relator seeks various declaratory, injunctive, and mandamus relief
against a prosecutor and County Court at Law No. 2 in Rockwall County.
Relator’s petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate
Procedure in numerous respects. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1; TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(a)–
(d)(3), (f)–(h), (j), (k)(1)(A); TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7. Thus, to the extent relator seeks
mandamus relief against the judge who presides over County Court at Law No. 2 in
Rockwall County, we deny relator’s petition because it does not meet the requirements for consideration of mandamus relief. See In re Guillaume, No. 05-24-
00765-CV, 2024 WL 3548511, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas July 26, 2024, orig.
proceeding) (mem. op.) (denying mandamus relief based on relator’s failure to
comply with several Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure).
To the extent relator seeks any other relief, we dismiss relator’s petition for
want of jurisdiction because the relief sought is not necessary to enforce the
jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a), (b); In re Miller,
05-23-00747-CV, 2023 WL 4881394, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug. 1, 2023, orig.
proceeding) (mem. op.) (injunctive and declaratory relief); In re Corbello, No. 09-
17-00398-CR, 2017 WL 4974623, at *1 (Tex. App.—Beaumont orig. proceeding)
(mem. op.) (not designated for publication) (per curiam) (mandamus relief against a
prosecutor).
/Bill Pedersen, III/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE 240930F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: C L Abor v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-c-l-abor-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.