in Re Byron Walker

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 26, 2013·No. 02-13-00329-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00329-CV

IN RE BYRON WALKER RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and

motion for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied because relator has not

provided us with a copy of the contempt order about which he complains. See

Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A). Relator’s motion for emergency relief is denied for

the reason that the relief requested is premature. Accordingly, relator’s petition

for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief are denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: September 26, 2013

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Byron Walker, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re Byron Walker (in Re Byron Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.