In Re: Byron Keith McHanny v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 7, 2024
Docket05-24-00899-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Byron Keith McHanny v. the State of Texas (In Re: Byron Keith McHanny v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Byron Keith McHanny v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

DISMISSED and Opinion Filed August 7, 2024

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-24-00899-CV

IN RE BYRON KEITH MCHANNY, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 303rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-15496

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Nowell, and Miskel Opinion by Justice Miskel Before the Court is relator’s July 31, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus

challenging the trial court’s temporary orders. Based on our review of the petition

and record, however, the trial court has since issued a final order resolving all claims

at issue. “It is well-settled that a temporary order is superseded by entry of a final

order, rendering moot any complaint about the temporary order.” Interest of B.W.S.,

No. 05-20-00343-CV, 2022 WL 2712494, at *4 (Tex. App.—Dallas July 13, 2022,

no pet.) (mem. op. nunc pro tunc). We lack jurisdiction over a moot proceeding. See

Elec. Reliability Council of Tex., Inc. v. Panda Power Generation Infrastructure Fund, LLC, 619 S.W.3d 628, 634–35 (Tex. 2021) (orig. proceeding) (discussing

mootness doctrine).

Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for lack of

jurisdiction. See id. Additionally, based on our review, relator’s petition and its

attached appendix contain unredacted sensitive data—such as a minor’s birthdate—

in violation of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.9.

Accordingly, we strike relator’s petition and its attached appendix.

/Emily Miskel/ EMILY MISKEL 240899F.P05 JUSTICE

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

CAMILLE COOPER, ROBERT On Appeal from the 471st Judicial NEVAREZ, THE ORSALO District Court, Collin County, Texas GROUP, LLC, LARRY COOK, and Trial Court Cause No. 471-06464- 5TH AVENUE ACQUISITIONS & 2018. VENTURE CAPITALISTS, LLC, Opinion delivered by Justice Garcia. Appellants Justices Reichek and Goldstein participating. No. 05-22-01295-CV V.

TCH ALTERA AHCC, LLC, Appellee

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

It is ORDERED that appellee TCH Altera AHCC, LLC recover its costs of this appeal from appellants Camille Cooper, Robert Nevarez, The Orsalo Group, LLC, Larry Cook, and 5th Avenue Acquisitions & Venture Capitalists, LLC.

Judgment entered this 7th day of August 2024.

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Byron Keith McHanny v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-byron-keith-mchanny-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.