in Re Byron B. Williams, Jr. and Quality Carriers, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 21, 2012·No. 01-12-00183-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued June 21, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00183-CV ——————————— IN RE BYRON B. WILLIAMS, JR. AND QUALITY CARRIERS, INC., Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators, Byron B. Williams, Jr. and Quality Carriers, Inc., petitioned for

writ of mandamus asking that we vacate the trial court’s order reinstating the cause

of action of real party in interest Jasmine Whitaker.1

1 The underlying case is JasmineWhitaker et al. v. Byron B. Williams, Jr. and Quality Carriers, Inc. d/b/a Quality Carriers, No. 2010-10947 (11th Dist. Ct., HarrisCnty., Tex.), the Honorable Mike Miller, presiding. On May 3, 2012, Whitaker filed a motion to dismiss the petition for writ of

mandamus as moot, stating that the underlying matter was nonsuited on March 30,

2012. Relators have not filed a response to this motion to dismiss, and more than

ten days have elapsed since this motion was filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the petition for writ of

mandamus as moot. Anyremaining motions are likewise dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Byron B. Williams, Jr. and Quality Carriers, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

in Re Byron B. Williams, Jr. and Quality Carriers, Inc. (in Re Byron B. Williams, Jr. and Quality Carriers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.