In re Byrne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Byrne

63 A.D.2d 709, 406 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11626

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 19, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 63 A.D.2d 709 (In re Byrne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Byrne, 63 A.D.2d 709, 406 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11626 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by petitioner to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law on the ground that respondent has been disbarred by virtue of a felony conviction. Motion granted. The respondent, admitted to practice before the Bar by this court on October 23, 1946, was convicted of a felony (violation of US Code, tit 15, § 1; tit 18, § 2) in that he aided, abetted, counseled and induced conspiracy to raise, fix, maintain and stabilize the prices of wiring devices and the terms and conditions of sales thereof, in the United States District Court, District of Connecticut, on March 10, 1978. The clerk of this court is directed to strike his name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law forthwith by reason of said conviction (Matter of Chu, 42 NY2d 490). Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by petitioner to strike the respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law on the ground that respondent has been disbarred by virtue of a felony conviction. Motion granted. The respondent, admitted to practice before the Bar by this court on October 23, 1946, was convicted of a felony (violation of US Code, tit 15, § 1; tit 18, § 2) in that he aided, abetted, counseled and induced conspiracy to raise, fix, maintain and stabilize the prices of wiring devices and the terms and conditions of sales thereof, in the United States District Court, District of Connecticut, on March 10, 1978. The clerk of this court is directed to strike his name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law forthwith by reason of said conviction (Matter of Chu, 42 NY2d 490). Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 A.D.2d 709, 406 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-byrne-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack