In re Byrne

905 A.2d 864, 188 N.J. 249, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1311
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 6, 2006·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 06-046, concluding that JAMES PETER BYRNE of WEST NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.5(c) and Rule 1:21-7(g) (failure to prepare written fee agreement), RPC 1.7(a) and (b) (conflict of interest), RPC 5.3(a), (b) and (c) (failure to supervise non-lawyer employees), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAMES PETER BYRNE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Byrne, 905 A.2d 864, 188 N.J. 249, 2006 N.J. LEXIS 1311 (N.J. 2006).

905 A.2d 864 (In re Byrne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.