In Re Buttercup Legacy, LLC
This text of In Re Buttercup Legacy, LLC (In Re Buttercup Legacy, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE BUTTERCUP LEGACY, LLC ____________________
2011-1450 Reexamination No. 90/008,820 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JOHN M GUYNN, Workman Nydegger, of Salt Lake City, Utah, argued for appellant. Of counsel on the brief was KEVIN W. BATES, Hatch, James & Dodge, of Salt Lake City, Utah.
SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent & Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and WILLIAM LAMARCA, Associate Solicitor. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (DYK, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 12, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Buttercup Legacy, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-buttercup-legacy-llc-cafc-2012.