In re Butler

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Butler

72 A.3d 245, 215 N.J. 302, 2013 WL 4777311, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 838

DecidedSeptember 6, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 72 A.3d 245 (In re Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Butler, 72 A.3d 245, 215 N.J. 302, 2013 WL 4777311, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 838 (N.J. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-430, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule l:20-14(a)(4)(E), TONYA BUTLER of SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2002, should be censured based on discipline imposed in the State of Tennessee that in New Jersey constitutes violations of RPC 5.5(a) (practicing law while ineligible to do so) and RPC 8.4(a) (violating or attempting to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that TONYA BUTLER is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[303]*303ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-430, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline pursuant to Rule l:20-14(a)(4)(E), TONYA BUTLER of SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2002, should be censured based on discipline imposed in the State of Tennessee that in New Jersey constitutes violations of RPC 5.5(a) (practicing law while ineligible to do so) and RPC 8.4(a) (violating or attempting to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that TONYA BUTLER is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[303]*303ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 A.3d 245, 215 N.J. 302, 2013 WL 4777311, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-butler-nj-2013.