In Re: Bush

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 11, 2011
Docket10-2103
StatusUnpublished

This text of In Re: Bush (In Re: Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Bush, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2103

In Re: BARBARA MICHELLE BUSH,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:10-cv-02191-AW)

Submitted: March 18, 2011 Decided: April 11, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barbara Michelle Bush, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Barbara Michelle Bush has filed a petition for writ of

mandamus pertaining to a civil action. She seeks recusal of the

district court judge assigned to the action and review of the

order remanding that action to state court.

Mandamus is a drastic remedy and should be used only

in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426

U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.

1987). Mandamus relief is available only where there is no

other available remedy. In re Braxton, 258 F.3d 250, 261 (4th

Cir. 2001). Because Bush had other means of pursuing the relief

she seeks, mandamus relief is not available.

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in

forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Diana R. Beard, (Two Cases)
811 F.2d 818 (Fourth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Bush, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bush-ca4-2011.