In re Burro
This text of 196 A.3d 560 (In re Burro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 17-402, concluding that C. Peter Burro, a/k/a C. P. Burro, of Somers Point, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1979, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect); RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence, RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter and to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information); RPC 1.16(d) (failure to return the client file upon termination of the representation); and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with ethics authorities), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that C. Peter Burro, a/k/a C.P. Burro, is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
196 A.3d 560, 235 N.J. 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-burro-nj-2018.