In Re: Burns, Unpublished Decision (9-17-1999)
This text of In Re: Burns, Unpublished Decision (9-17-1999) (In Re: Burns, Unpublished Decision (9-17-1999)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In due course, appointed counsel filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California (1967),
After comprehensive and complete review of the record in this case, it is impossible to pinpoint any error or mistake which would merit the Court of Appeals overturning the agreement that was reached in regards to granting custody per the March 1998 hearing. During that hearing, Appellant was represented by counsel, was fully aware of her rights as a parent and with full knowledge of her rights, choose [sic] to give the father custody. It is clear from both the record and additional discussions with the attorneys who were involved in the drafting of the custody agreement that the appellant understood the consequences of the agreement and entered into this agreement freely and without duress or force.
The appellant has been given information regarding the proper format for changing or challenging the custody agreement and is aware of her options at the local level to assert her parental rights. She has been told that there does not appear to be any error in the record which would merit argument before this Court and that there does not appear to be legitimate grounds for appeal. This brief is filed pursuant to Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (1967) to certify that there was no apparent error in the trial proceedings.
The use of the Anders brief and procedure is appropriate in child custody cases. In Re: Egbert Children (1994),
No such pro se brief has been filed.
We have thoroughly examined the record of proceedings in this case, and we agree with the assessment of appellate counsel that there are no meritorious issues for appellate review.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
GRADY, P.J. and FAIN, J., concur.
Copies mailed to:
Cheryl A. Ross
Dennis J. Adkins
Brenda Collins
Hon. Nick Kuntz
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Burns, Unpublished Decision (9-17-1999), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-burns-unpublished-decision-9-17-1999-ohioctapp-1999.