In re Burns
174 A.D. 887
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1916
StatusPublished
This text of 174 A.D. 887 (In re Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Burns, 174 A.D. 887 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
The order so far as George F. Aitken, Max Behar, George Dugan, Lester Levy, Daniel J. Pitot, William A. [888]*888Rodgers and Benjamin Uberall are concerned is reversed. In all other respects the order is affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
174 A.D. 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-burns-nyappdiv-1916.