In re Burns
174 A.D. 887
Opinion
The order so far as George F. Aitken, Max Behar, George Dugan, Lester Levy, Daniel J. Pitot, William A. [888]*888Rodgers and Benjamin Uberall are concerned is reversed. In all other respects the order is affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Burns, 174 A.D. 887 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
174 A.D. 887 (In re Burns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.