In re Burnett-Baker
This text of 709 A.2d 198 (In re Burnett-Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board on March 17, 1998, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that HILDA BURNETT-BAKER of RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, and who thereafter was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and who remains suspended at this time, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that HILDA BURNETT-BAKER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
709 A.2d 198, 153 N.J. 357, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-burnett-baker-nj-1998.