In re Burnett-Baker
This text of 700 A.2d 1233 (In re Burnett-Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Disciplinary Review Board on August 5, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that HILDA BURNETT-[483]*483BAKER of RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect); RPC 1.1(b) (pattern of neglect); RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence); and RPC 8.4(c) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation); and good cause appearing;
It is ORDERED that HILDA BURNETT-BAKER is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, effective immediately, and until further Order of the Court; and it is further
ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of her suspension and that she comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
700 A.2d 1233, 151 N.J. 482, 1997 N.J. LEXIS 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-burnett-baker-nj-1997.