In re Burby
88 N.Y.S. 1094
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1903
StatusPublished
This text of 88 N.Y.S. 1094 (In re Burby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Burby, 88 N.Y.S. 1094 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).
Opinion
Ordered, that Henry P. Pendrick, Esq., of Saragato Springs, N. Y., be appointed referee to take testimony and report to the court with his opinion thereon, and that Horace E. McKnight, Esq., of Ballston Spa, New York, be substituted as attorney in place of George R. Salisbury, Esq., to prosecute the proceeding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
88 N.Y.S. 1094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-burby-nyappdiv-1903.