In re Buoscio

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Buoscio

5 N.E.3d 1287, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1455

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 1, 2014·Published

Opinion

On December 21, 2011, this court found Samuel L. Buoscio to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prae.R. 4.03. This court further ordered that Buoscio was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in the court without obtaining leave. On March 20, 2014, Buoscio presented an application for leave to file.

It is ordered by the court that the application for leave is denied.

Pfeifer, Acting C.J. O’Connor, C.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On December 21, 2011, this court found Samuel L. Buoscio to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prae.R. 4.03. This court further ordered that Buoscio was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in the court without obtaining leave. On March 20, 2014, Buoscio presented an application for leave to file.

It is ordered by the court that the application for leave is denied.

Pfeifer, Acting C.J. O’Connor, C.J., not participating.

In re Buoscio, 5 N.E.3d 1287, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1455 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

5 N.E.3d 1287 (In re Buoscio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.