In re Bund

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Bund

12 A.D.2d 300, 210 N.Y.S.2d 735, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12586

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 300 (In re Bund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bund, 12 A.D.2d 300, 210 N.Y.S.2d 735, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counsellor at law by the Appellate Division in the First Judicial Department on June 21, 1950.

On October 31, 1960 respondent was duly convicted in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York for the crimes of grand larceny in the first degree and forgery in the [301]*301second degree, which are felonies (Penal Law, §§ 1290, 1294, 880, 887). Pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, respondent then ceased to be a member of the Bar. The statutory provision is mandatory and upon proof of conviction an order of disbarment follows as a matter of course.

The respondent should be disbarred.

Botein, P. J., Breitel, Babin, Eager and Bastow, JJ., concur.

Respondent struck from the roll of attorneys and counsellors at law in the State of New York pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law of the State of New York.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI