In re Bullock
This text of 104 F. App'x 297 (In re Bullock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Vernon Bullock petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) case. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court has dismissed Bullock’s § 2241 petition. Because the district court has recently decided Bullock’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 F. App'x 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bullock-ca4-2004.