In re Bukosky

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Bukosky

580 A.2d 1085, 121 N.J. 399, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 1384

DecidedOctober 23, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 580 A.2d 1085 (In re Bukosky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bukosky, 580 A.2d 1085, 121 N.J. 399, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 1384 (N.J. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

ALBERT M. BUKOSKY of Linden, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1965, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ALBERT M. BUKOSKY is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

[400]*400ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

ALBERT M. BUKOSKY of Linden, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1965, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ALBERT M. BUKOSKY is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

[400]*400ORDERED that respondent comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with disbarred attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

580 A.2d 1085, 121 N.J. 399, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 1384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bukosky-nj-1990.