In re Buie

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Buie

193 So. 3d 1167, 2016 La. LEXIS 1367, 2016 WL 3176435

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 3, 2016

DocketNo. 2016-B-0863

StatusPublished

This text of 193 So. 3d 1167 (In re Buie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Buie, 193 So. 3d 1167, 2016 La. LEXIS 1367, 2016 WL 3176435 (La. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent knowingly failed to promptly return a client’s file. Respondent also failed to cooperate with the ODC in its investigation of this matter. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that David K. Buie, Louisiana Bar Roll number 21507, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS' FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty [1168]*1168days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

hThe Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent knowingly failed to promptly return a client’s file. Respondent also failed to cooperate with the ODC in its investigation of this matter. Following the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that David K. Buie, Louisiana Bar Roll number 21507, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS' FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty [1168]*1168days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 So. 3d 1167, 2016 La. LEXIS 1367, 2016 WL 3176435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-buie-la-2016.