In re Buechter

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Buechter

781 N.E.2d 1017, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1407

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 2003·No. 2002-1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Miami App. No. 2002CA22, 2002-Ohio-5598. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Decision and Entry dated November 8, 2002:

“The certified issue is whether a court has subject-matter jurisdiction to award retroactive child-support payments in a paternity action filed after the child has reached the age of majority.”

The conflict cases are Snider v. Lillie (1997), 131 Ohio App.3d 444, 722 N.E.2d 1036, and In re Livingston (1996), 115 Ohio App.3d 613, 685 N.E.2d 1285.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miami App. No. 2002CA22, 2002-Ohio-5598. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Decision and Entry dated November 8, 2002:

“The certified issue is whether a court has subject-matter jurisdiction to award retroactive child-support payments in a paternity action filed after the child has reached the age of majority.”

The conflict cases are Snider v. Lillie (1997), 131 Ohio App.3d 444, 722 N.E.2d 1036, and In re Livingston (1996), 115 Ohio App.3d 613, 685 N.E.2d 1285.

In re Buechter, 781 N.E.2d 1017, 98 Ohio St. 3d 1407 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

781 N.E.2d 1017 (In re Buechter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related