In re Bucks County Investigating Grand Jury

867 A.2d 1262, 581 Pa. 624, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 170
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 18, 2005·No. No. 119 MM 2004·Published

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of January, 2005, upon consideration of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s Petition for Reconsideration and Oral Argument en banc and the Supplement to Application for Petition for Reconsideration and Oral Argument en banc, it is hereby ordered that the Petition for Reconsideration and Oral Argument en banc are DENIED.

It is further noted that in camera proceedings may be conducted if the trial [1263] judge, in his discretion, considers them appropriate.

Justice CASTILLE files a Dissenting Statement in which Justice EAKIN joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Bucks County Investigating Grand Jury, 867 A.2d 1262, 581 Pa. 624, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 170 (Pa. 2005).

867 A.2d 1262 (In re Bucks County Investigating Grand Jury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Bucks County Investigating Grand Jury
862 A.2d 581 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2004)