In re Buckner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Buckner

660 A.2d 500, 140 N.J. 613, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 608

DecidedJuly 10, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 660 A.2d 500 (In re Buckner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Buckner, 660 A.2d 500, 140 N.J. 613, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 608 (N.J. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court recommending that HOWARD Z. BUCKNER of EDISON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1981, be reprimanded for violating RPC 8.4(c) by signing the name of a client to a deed with only the oral authorization of the client;

And the Disciplinary Review Board further recommending that the charges of violation of RPC 8.4(a) and RPC 8.4(b) be dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence;

And HOWARD Z. BUCKNER having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that HOWARD Z. BUCKNER is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[614]*614ORDERED that the charges of violation of RPC 8.4(a) and (b) be dismissed for lack of clear and convincing evidence; and it is further

ORDERED that entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

. ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

WITNESS, the Honorable Robert N. Wilentz, Chief Justice, at Trenton, this 5th day of July, 1995.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI