In Re Buck, Kiaer Co. v. Hartmann Co.

154 N.E. 618, 243 N.Y. 591, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 869
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 5, 1926
StatusPublished

This text of 154 N.E. 618 (In Re Buck, Kiaer Co. v. Hartmann Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Buck, Kiaer Co. v. Hartmann Co., 154 N.E. 618, 243 N.Y. 591, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 869 (N.Y. 1926).

Opinion

Order of Appellate Division modified by striking out that portion thereof appointing Alexander Rose arbitrator to hear and determine the matters and things set forth under the letters "A," "B," "C" and "D" in the *Page 592 notice of motion herein and by striking out the reference made in said items "A," "B" and "C" to samples submitted by Wm. Hartmann Co., Inc., prior to the making of the contract referred to in the petition, and by providing that the arbitrators appointed by the parties proceed to determine the matters and things set forth under letters "A," "B," "C" and "D" in the said notice of motion as so modified, appointing an umpire before proceeding with the hearing, and as so modified affirmed, without costs to either party; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
154 N.E. 618, 243 N.Y. 591, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-buck-kiaer-co-v-hartmann-co-ny-1926.