In re Bryan

4 P. 304, 65 Cal. 375, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 560
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 12, 1884
DocketNo. 9,648
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 4 P. 304 (In re Bryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Bryan, 4 P. 304, 65 Cal. 375, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 560 (Cal. 1884).

Opinion

The Court.

The application for a writ of review herein must be denied.

[376]*376In our judgment the Superior Court in which the proceeding for condemnation was brought has full jurisdiction to prevent the plaintiff, or any one claiming under it, from taking possession of the land sought to be condemned, until the order for such taking possession has been made by said court. (Code Civ. Proc. § 1254.) If possession has been taken in advance of such order by the court allowing plaintiff to take possession, the Superior Court has power to have the possession restored to the defendant. Hence the applicant has a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law, by recourse by motion to the Superior Court above referred to.

Writ denied and application dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Felton Water Co. v. Superior Court
256 P. 255 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
San Diego Land & Town Co. v. Neale
20 P. 380 (California Supreme Court, 1888)
Neale v. Superior Court
18 P. 790 (California Supreme Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 P. 304, 65 Cal. 375, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-bryan-cal-1884.