In re Brutten

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Brutten

96 A.D.2d 1070, 466 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19719

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 16, 1983·Published

Opinion

Proceedings by petitioner, pursuant to the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 691.13) to suspend the respondent Alan Brutten, an attorney and counselor at law, admitted to practice by this court on June 21,1967 under the name Alan Irwin Brutten because of his present mental disability. Upon the respondent’s consent, Alan Brutten is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the State of New York, pending the further order of this court. No application for reinstatement will be acted upon, without respondent having first submitted to both physical and mental examination. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Mangano, Thompson and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceedings by petitioner, pursuant to the rules of this court (22 NYCRR 691.13) to suspend the respondent Alan Brutten, an attorney and counselor at law, admitted to practice by this court on June 21,1967 under the name Alan Irwin Brutten because of his present mental disability. Upon the respondent’s consent, Alan Brutten is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the State of New York, pending the further order of this court. No application for reinstatement will be acted upon, without respondent having first submitted to both physical and mental examination. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Mangano, Thompson and Brown, JJ., concur.

In re Brutten, 96 A.D.2d 1070, 466 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19719 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

96 A.D.2d 1070 (In re Brutten) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.