In re Bruton

Supreme Court of Georgia

In re Bruton

330 S.E.2d 595, 254 Ga. 466, 1985 Ga. LEXIS 757

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 19, 1985

DocketSupreme Court Disciplinary No. 424

StatusPublished

This text of 330 S.E.2d 595 (In re Bruton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Bruton, 330 S.E.2d 595, 254 Ga. 466, 1985 Ga. LEXIS 757 (Ga. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

Bruton was charged by the State Bar with violations of Standards 13 (a) and (b), Standard 26, and Standard 4 of Bar Rule 4-102. It was alleged that he agreed to pay a non-lawyer portion of legal fees in exchange for recommendations to do legal services. It was also alleged that Bruton caused a forged signature of his girl friend’s father to be placed on a deed to secure debt as a witness.

Bruton answered and admitted the allegations. The State Disci[467]*467plinary Board recommended suspension for one year. We adopt this recommendation.

Decided June 19, 1985. William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, Bridget B. Bagley, Assistant General Counsel State Bar, for State Bar of Georgia.

Attorney Charles C. Bruton is suspended from the practice of law in the State of Georgia for a period of one year commencing July 1, 1985.

So ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI