In re Brush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Brush

173 A.D. 960, 159 N.Y.S. 1103

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 173 A.D. 960 (In re Brush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Brush, 173 A.D. 960, 159 N.Y.S. 1103 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion should have been granted. The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disburse[961]*961ments to the appellant against the administrator personally, and the proceeding remitted to the Surrogate’s Court for further action, as above indicated. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Smith and Davis, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant as against the administrator personally, and motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion should have been granted. The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disburse[961]*961ments to the appellant against the administrator personally, and the proceeding remitted to the Surrogate’s Court for further action, as above indicated. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Smith and Davis, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant as against the administrator personally, and motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 A.D. 960, 159 N.Y.S. 1103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brush-nyappdiv-1916.