In re Brune

California Court of Appeal

In re Brune

113 Cal. App. 254

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 8, 1931

DocketCrim. No. 1629

StatusPublished

This text of 113 Cal. App. 254 (In re Brune) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Brune, 113 Cal. App. 254 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

Habeas corpus. Petitioner claims he is unlawfully imprisoned for failure to comply with an order requiring him to pay certain sums for the support and maintenance of his wife. He alleges that since the making of the order a disability to comply therewith has arisen. The petition is denied on the ground that no application for discharge has been first made "in the court below. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1143; In re Wilson, 75 Cal. 580 [17 Pac. 698].)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

Habeas corpus. Petitioner claims he is unlawfully imprisoned for failure to comply with an order requiring him to pay certain sums for the support and maintenance of his wife. He alleges that since the making of the order a disability to comply therewith has arisen. The petition is denied on the ground that no application for discharge has been first made "in the court below. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1143; In re Wilson, 75 Cal. 580 [17 Pac. 698].)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 Cal. App. 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brune-calctapp-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack