In re Brumelkamp

N.D. New York

In re Brumelkamp

95 F. 814, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 443

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. New York

DecidedJune 12, 1899

DocketNo. 1,126

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 95 F. 814 (In re Brumelkamp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Brumelkamp, 95 F. 814, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 443 (N.D.N.Y. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

COXE, District Judge.

The order made by the referee is one entirely within the scope of his authority pursuant to the provisions of the bankruptcy act and rule xx. of this court. Even though a motion to vacate or modify the referee’s order were properly noticed before me I would not dictate to the referee as to matters so peculiarly within his province. The administration of the law will be fraught with endless vexations if the judge assumes to meddle with the referees as to matters within their discretion. The affidavit of Mr. Smith, one of the attorneys for the bankrupt, dated June 5, 1899, may induce the referee to modify the objection numbered 1 in Ms order of June 1st. In any view such applications should first be presented to the referee. The matter is referred to the referee to take such action thereon as he may deem advisable.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COXE, District Judge.

The order made by the referee is one entirely within the scope of his authority pursuant to the provisions of the bankruptcy act and rule xx. of this court. Even though a motion to vacate or modify the referee’s order were properly noticed before me I would not dictate to the referee as to matters so peculiarly within his province. The administration of the law will be fraught with endless vexations if the judge assumes to meddle with the referees as to matters within their discretion. The affidavit of Mr. Smith, one of the attorneys for the bankrupt, dated June 5, 1899, may induce the referee to modify the objection numbered 1 in Ms order of June 1st. In any view such applications should first be presented to the referee. The matter is referred to the referee to take such action thereon as he may deem advisable.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 F. 814, 1899 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brumelkamp-nynd-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack