in Re Bruce Stanley Griffin

Opinion

Opinion issued June 9, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

An appellate court has the power to issue a writ of mandamus, other than against a district or county court judge, to enforce its jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a),(b) (West 2004); In re Smith, 263 S.W.3d 93, 95 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding). Relator is not seeking to enforce our jurisdiction. Instead, he is seeking mandamus relief against the Brazoria District Clerk for acts that do not relate to our jurisdiction. Accordingly, we have no jurisdiction to grant the relief relator seeks.

We dismiss the petitions for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Brown, and Huddle.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-16-00344-CV NO. 01-16-00345-CV ——————————— IN RE BRUCE STANLEY GRIFFIN, Relator Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Bruce Stanley Griffin, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in two trial court causes, challenging the Brazoria District Clerk’s withdrawals from Griffin’s inmate trust account.1 1 The underlying cases are The State of Texas v. Bruce Stanley Griffin, cause number 66035 and 66036, pending in the 23rd District Court of Brazoria County, Texas, the Honorable Ben Hardin, presiding.