In re Brown

494 S.E.2d 812, 329 S.C. 309, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 223
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided December 18, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b), RJDE, Rule 502, SCACR, for willfully violating an order of this Court. Respondent opposes the relief sought in the petition.

We hereby place respondent on interim suspension from his duties as a probate judge until further order of this Court. We also find that respondent’s conduct warrants an interim suspension from the practice of law pursuant to Rule 17(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Respondent’s license to practice law in this State is therefore suspended until further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J. /s/ Jean H. Toa!, A.J. /s/ James E. Moore, A.J. /s/ John H. Waller, Jr., A.J. /s/ E.C. Burnett, III, A.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Brown, 494 S.E.2d 812, 329 S.C. 309, 1997 S.C. LEXIS 223 (S.C. 1997).

494 S.E.2d 812 (In re Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Brown
522 S.E.2d 814 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1999)