In re Brown

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Brown

268 S.E.2d 284, 275 S.C. 180, 1980 S.C. LEXIS 410

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJuly 22, 1980

Docket21266

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 268 S.E.2d 284 (In re Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Brown, 268 S.E.2d 284, 275 S.C. 180, 1980 S.C. LEXIS 410 (S.C. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is a grievance proceeding charging Russell Brown, an attorney, with various acts of professional misconduct. The Panel found respondent guilty of the commingling of funds in violation of DR 9-102 (a) and recommended imposition of a private reprimand. The Executive Committee concluded that the commingling charge was continuing in nature and additionally found the respondent guilty of violation of DR 2-107(A) because he improperly split fees. Imposition of a public reprimand was recommended by the Committee.

After a hearing and a full consideration of this matter, we concur in the findings and recommendations of the Executive Committee.

Attorney Russell Brown stands publicly reprimanded by this Court in accordance with Rule 7A(3) of the Supreme Court Rules on Disciplinary Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This is a grievance proceeding charging Russell Brown, an attorney, with various acts of professional misconduct. The Panel found respondent guilty of the commingling of funds in violation of DR 9-102 (a) and recommended imposition of a private reprimand. The Executive Committee concluded that the commingling charge was continuing in nature and additionally found the respondent guilty of violation of DR 2-107(A) because he improperly split fees. Imposition of a public reprimand was recommended by the Committee.

After a hearing and a full consideration of this matter, we concur in the findings and recommendations of the Executive Committee.

Attorney Russell Brown stands publicly reprimanded by this Court in accordance with Rule 7A(3) of the Supreme Court Rules on Disciplinary Procedure.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 S.E.2d 284, 275 S.C. 180, 1980 S.C. LEXIS 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-brown-sc-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack