Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Brown

In re Brown

302 A.D.2d 744, 754 N.Y.S.2d 590, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1730
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 A.D.3d 56 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 19, 2003·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent, an Albany attorney, was admitted to practice by this Court in 1992. He was suspended in July 1999 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (.Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 262 AD2d 702). He was also suspended in September 2002 for failure to comply with a subpoena issued by this Court (.Matter of Brown, 297 AD2d 860). He now applies for reinstatement.

Since it appears that respondent has now registered and has substantially complied with the other conditions set forth in this Court’s September 12, 2002 decision (Matter of Brown, supra), his application for reinstatement is granted, effective immediately.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted, and he is reinstated to practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Brown, 302 A.D.2d 744, 754 N.Y.S.2d 590, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1730 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

302 A.D.2d 744 (In re Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
262 A.D.2d 702 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
In re Brown
297 A.D.2d 860 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)